Skip to main content

Huffington Post recently obtained an internal Walmart document detailing the company's official compensation policy.  It was implemented in response to a lawsuit alleging that women were systemically discriminated against in pay and promotion opportunities.  However, it's created another problem that's serious enough to merit a repost from yesterday.  Many of Walmart's hourly employees are locked into wages that aren't nearly enough for them to live decently.  It's a major reason why several employees are planning strikes and other protests on Black Friday.

The company website declares that "a job at Walmart opens the door to a better life" and "the chance to grow and build a career." But interviews with 31 hourly workers and one former store manager reveal lives beset by paychecks too small to handle the bills, difficult to manage part-time schedules with hours subject to constant change, and little reason to hope for career advancement. Citing fear of losing their jobs, most spoke on the condition of anonymity.
[snip]
Low-level workers typically start near minimum wage, and have the potential to earn raises of 20 to 40 cents an hour through incremental promotions. Flawless performance merits a 60 cent raise per year under the policy, regardless of how much time an employee has worked for the company.  As a result, a "solid performer" who starts at Walmart as a cart pusher making $8 an hour and receives one promotion, about the average rate, can expect to make $10.60 after working at the company for 6 years.
The document, called the "Field Non-Exempt Associate Pay Plan," can be viewed as a PDF or at Docstoc.  While it is addressed to Sam's Club, multiple sources confirmed that it applies to Walmart stores as well.  It was implemented in 2004 in response to the Dukes case, which charged Walmart systemically held down salaries for female employees.  Walmart contended that any discrimination was the result of managers playing favorites.  While the new system eliminated this practice, it also makes it difficult for most hourly employees to earn enough to get above the poverty line, let alone earn middle-class salaries.  And even if you get a promotion, it's barely enough to make a living.  The highest-paid hourly employees make only $1.70 an hour more than the lowest-paid ones.

Some of the stories are absolute tear-jerkers.  A deli worker at an Illinois Walmart earns only $9.10 an hour--not nearly enough to pay her bills and her student loans.  She recently had to file for bankruptcy.  Another worker in Mississippi is the sole wage-earner for his family of five, but only makes $8.65 an hour and is forced to use food stamps.

The problem is exacerbated by Walmart's longstanding practice of keeping most of its hourly employees part-time.  For instance, a retired manager in the Midwest said that only 30 percent of his hourly employees were allowed to be full-time--and most of them started out at wages barely above minimum wage.  He also said that soon after the new pay scale was implemented, many of his employees earning high wages were pushed out in favor of lower-paid ones.

What makes it even more obscene is that Walmart's stock recently hit an all-time high this year, and it recently reported a nine-percent jump in its profits.  And yet, it doesn't have enough money to pay its workers enough to make a half-decent living?  As much distaste as I had for Walmart, I continued to shop there only because there are certain items that you can't find anywhere else in Charlotte.  But after this, in all likelihood I'm going to bite the bullet and go elsewhere for my groceries.  I may be paying a few dollars more for food, but it's better than giving my money to a company that treats its employees this way.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Please America Support These Hard Working People (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MadRuth

      For our country to be in the midst of recovering from the great recession and for a company to be hitting an all time high stock price ????? Where is this picture not blatantly obvious that this company is as bad a Human Rights violator as any communist country ever was???
       It is time we stand with our brothers/sisters and fight this evil and yes I said evil because that is exactly what the WALMART CORP represents and total disregard for working class families!!!

  •  re huffpo's example: (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    VClib, nextstep

    it assumes no promotions over the course of those years as an exemplary employee.  I don't know the first thing about Walmart, so maybe someone can let me know if that's realistic.

  •  I worked for a company just like this, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MadRuth

    but way smaller. It was venture-capital funded and had yet to turn a profit. The people who actually worked with the public were part of an ill-paid ghetto; the upper managers, of whom there were probably too many, had their own, much cozier thing. One executive manager who basically didn't do anything for the company, made a point of eating his brown-bag lunch in the employee lunchroom and rubbing elbows with the "common people." But we all saw right through him. We knew that the pay was the real measure of how the company regarded us. (Not highly.)

    Now, since that time, I have worked for other companies who make the mistake of that nutty upper manager, in believing that expressions of "goodwill" on the part of management to employees can serve as a form of in-kind payment, compensating for an inadequate salary.

    Don't fall for it. For hard work, demand adequate pay.

    It's here they got the range/ and the machinery for change/ and it's here they got the spiritual thirst. --Leonard Cohen

    by karmsy on Sun Nov 18, 2012 at 07:50:01 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site