Skip to main content

I have a concern: Teachers are getting pummeled. Too often, they are being demonized in the media and blamed by politicians for being the cause of bad schools. Right-wing governors, power-hungry mayors and corporate “reformers”—all ignoring root issues such as poverty and inequality—have scapegoated the people who have devoted their lives to educating our children. Moreover, these forces are seeking to destroy the collective organizations formed by educators: teachers unions.

The stakes for our country could not be more profound. The labor movement and the public education system are two critical institutions of American democracy. And they are two that go hand in hand. Teachers unions have played a critical role in advocating for public education, but you'd never know it from mainstream media coverage. Therefore, there is a great need to lift up this tradition and highlight the efforts of teachers to collectively push for top-notch public schools.

To figure out how we can push forward on this issue, I talked with Diane Ravitch, one of the country's leading education historians and public school advocates. A professor at New York University, Ravitch is a former Assistant Secretary of Education and the author of several books, including 2010’s The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education.

What do you see as the role of teachers unions in preserving public education?

For many years, there has been an effort to diminish teachers unions and to blame them for all the problems of public education. I believe the reason, first of all, is that some people just hate unions. But there’s also a political reason that’s very specific. That is that if you silence the union, then there’s nobody at the table when the legislature or the governor wants to cut the budget, so they can hack away at will. That’s happening in states across the country. I was in Texas a few weeks ago, and there the legislature cut over $5 billion dollars from the education budget, but they did manage to squeeze out $500 million dollars for more testing. They have a weak union. They had no one at the table to say, “You can’t do this.” And no one cared what the teachers thought anyway.

This past summer, you championed the Chicago teachers strike as an example of teachers publicly transcending self-interest and pushing for better conditions in the schools. Can you speak about some of the victories have shown a different style of advocacy from teachers?

Well, the teachers' union had a problem in that most of the things they were concerned about they’re not allowed to collectively bargain. The law says they’re not allowed to collectively bargain the teaching and learning conditions, but that was the essence of the strike. They had to say that they were striking over something that was legal and not over something that the law didn’t allow. I think that one of the things that they were able to accomplish—and it’s a small accomplishment but an important one—is that the mayor wanted the [teachers’ performance] evaluations to be based, I think, 40 or 50 percent on [student] test scores. They got it down to what was the legally required minimum. My own view is that the test scores should account for zero in teacher evaluation.

One of the historical roles of the labor movement is that unions have been a symbol of high standards of quality. If you have your electrical wiring done by a union electrician, for instance, you don't have to worry about fires in your home. In the same way, teachers' unions played a role in forming teaching as a profession with high standards for its practitioners. Can you point to examples where teachers are taking the lead on issues of accountability and evaluation?

The nature of being a professional involves self-regulation. Professions are supposed to set [their own] standards. That involves a certain amount of autonomy, but it also means that you meet professional standards. Lawyers set standards for lawyers, and doctors set standards of good practice for doctors. Then there’s a certain amount of self-policing.

I think that if there’s any way in which unions could be faulted, it’s that they have ceded that to management.  So over the years, unions have come to see their role as defending their members and not setting the standards of practice, and so that’s management’s job. They have ceded that role. And I think that now they find themselves in a bind because there’s been this mass of publicity campaigns to make unions seem evil.

What I’ve seen in state after state is that the teachers are losing their collective bargaining rights. I’m not sure that anything they could have done as a union would’ve changed that because in so many of these states, the governors, whether it’s Ohio or Indiana or Texas, the governors are just very, very right-wing and don’t want unions, period. Nothing they could’ve done would’ve changed the governors' and the legislatures' desire to strip the unions.

I agree. But in Democratic states and some strongly pro-union areas, we still hear a trope about teachers not stepping up on issues of accountability and evaluation. Do you see some hesitation here?

I think that this is where peer review comes in, and I think that in places where there are peer review systems, then the union does step up.

Part of what I object to about in this whole line of discussion, not from you but nationally, is the assumption that somehow the problems in American education are all tied up with teachers. The teachers are causing low performance, and if we could just find the ideal teacher evaluation system, we would be the highest performing nation in the world. I think that’s a false narrative that’s been promoted by a combination of Bill Gates and Arne Duncan and lots of right-wing groups who want to say we don’t need to spend anything more on poor kids, we don’t need to do a thing about poverty, we just need to weed out those bad teachers.

I also agree that poverty and inequality are core issues that are not being addressed, and that teachers cannot be held accountable for these. Can you identify some of things that are within teachers' field of control, around which unions could help create just systems of evaluation?

Knowing your subject, being able to communicate your subject to the students, giving assignments that students understand, that are thought-provoking, encourage and enable students to produce good work—and reviewing the quality of that work so it shows that the students are really engaged and are really learning. The metrics would not be hard metrics like a test score, but they would be meaningful metrics. These would be professional judgments.

We have very high-performing schools both in the US and overseas in places where there are strong teachers' unions. In these schools, union strength and quality of education are going hand-in-hand. How are these examples relevant to the discussion?

Everybody likes to point to Finland. Finland is a great country, and they have a wonderful school system there. It’s 100 percent union, and the principals and the teachers all belong to the same union.

You find the same thing in the US. The highest performing schools in the US are in union states. What are the three highest performing states? Massachusetts, New Jersey and Connecticut. They’re all union. The lowest performing states are either right-to-work states or nonunion states, places with weak teachers unions.

If you look at the highest performing districts, public schools districts in the US, they’re all union—and they’re in suburbs. It’s because the relevant factor is not union or non-union but wealth and poverty.

Politicians often refer to the high pay of teachers and imply that somehow it’s not a good investment. How, in your opinion, taxpayers should view teacher pay, and what role should unions play in trying to influence public perception?

The national media is so anti-union and anti-teacher and anti-public education that you will see it frequently. That the average teacher’s salary in Chicago is around $75,000 is supposed to be a big black eye for the union. Well, that’s ridiculous. Why shouldn’t a professional be paid $75,000? The people who are complaining about this are usually paid many multiples of $75,000. I don’t see that as something the union should be embarrassed about. They should be proud of it.

Part of what unions have done has been to create a middle-class. You don’t become a teacher and go through four years of college and then get a master’s degree or even higher in order to work for poverty wages. You’re supposed to be a professional. Why shouldn’t professionals be paid as professionals?

Originally published on In These Times.

Originally posted to amybdean on Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 04:49 PM PST.

Also republished by In Support of Labor and Unions.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Great Job Framing Right Wing F'king LIES as (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    George3, slowbutsure, Ojibwa

    valid starting points for questions!

    Looking for work with Arne Duncan and the lying yuppie scum of the Gate$ A$tro Turf$??

    rmm

    seattle.

    http://www.dailykos.com/...

    Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; He thinks too much: such men are dangerous

    by seabos84 on Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 05:44:44 PM PST

    •  The American Federation of Teachers (0+ / 0-)

      (my union) apparently doesn't agree, since they just shared this diary on facebook.

      Light is seen through a small hole.

      by houyhnhnm on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 01:23:27 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  good for them! keep compromising with Arne (0+ / 0-)

        cuz ...

        you're affluent and can afford the Stockholm Syndrome style of DLC Third Way New Dem sell out politics?

        You don't know you're in the bottom 95% and a lot of Sell Out Dems are working real hard to enable right liars moving the 95th percentile of hourly wages to $9.95 ??

        Want to grok modern teacher union politics with the lying abusers running most of the Democratic Party? Check out the lyrics of "Love The Way You Lie"

        rmm.

        Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; He thinks too much: such men are dangerous

        by seabos84 on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 03:36:33 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  I'm from Central and I'm Here to Help You (4+ / 0-)

    In a period of temporary insanity in my life I was a school superintendent for 9 years. (Never applied--think Enron)

    I can't thank the unions enough for helping us to smooth out politics and improve education. Yes, I was forced to "honestly disagree" a few times, but they were constantly professional in their disagreements.

    The anti-union trend in the GOP has nothing to do with education. It's an effort to buy the education of the white kids and starve the systems that serve all the rest.

  •  Great, great, timely post! Two things: (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    historys mysteries, Ojibwa

    1)  Ravitch has an article in the 11/19/12 "The New Yorker".  For me, here is the money quote (literally):  "In Manhattan, private-equity companies had begun holding conferences to attract capital for investment in education.  Education had become a place to make a lot of money, in software for testing and in for-profit charters.  Speaking of the investment potential, Rupert Murdoch, whose news Corporation has and education subsidiary called Amplify, referred to education as "a five-hundred-billion-dollar sector""

    Just what we want: rich fat cats making money from our poor kids, and in the US, we have a lot of them.  In my community, some schools have over 80% (we still teach to the whole child but it is a huge struggle given funding - and we are extremely grateful for union support)

    2)  As a League of Women Voters member, I once asked (as a devil's advocate) why we needed a teacher's union.  One of the many gray-haired spitfires former teachers on that committee reminded me that 'back in the day' 'professional' women only had opportunities as a teacher or a secretary and absolutely no security from sexual harassment and that their pay could be cut on the least whim of those in power.  I have experienced both in a different profession.  I know that unions are not perfect but they are absolutely necessary (not perfect - Mafia in
    NYC Teamsters in early 80's)

    ...Son, those Elephants always look out for themselves. If you happen to get a crumb or two from their policies, it's a complete coincidence. -Malharden's Dad

    by slowbutsure on Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 06:23:08 PM PST

  •  I feel physically sick (0+ / 0-)

    when I think of the push to ruin my profession by politicians and their sources of money. I am so tired.

    "There must be more to life than having everything" -Maurice Sendak

    by lilypew on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 06:07:27 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site