Skip to main content

   One of the most powerful weapons used against unions is to essentially write them out of history: children don't learn about unions in schools. Most politicians only mention unions when they are slumming for a check for their campaigns or they promise to put on sneakers and walk picket lines when elected but somehow that promise is forgotten once the election is over; they talk great rhetoric about the "middle class" but you almost never hear, unprompted and certainly not in front of crowds outside a union hall, a great speech about unions and their central place in making a healthy economy. Which is why the despicable refusal to elect Marvin Miller to baseball's Hall of Fame matters--and it should matter to every person who cares about unions, even if you've never watched a minute of baseball in your life.

  Marvin Miller died yesterday:

Marvin Miller, an economist and labor leader who became one of the most important figures in baseball history by building the major league players union into a force that revolutionized the game, died on Tuesday at his home in Manhattan. He was 95.
By the time Mr. Miller retired at the end of 1982, he had secured his place on baseball’s Mount Rushmore by forging one of the strongest unions in America, creating a model for those in basketball, football and hockey.

Never had the dugout been so professionalized. The average player salary had reached $241,000, the pension plan had become generous, and players had won free agency and were hiring agents to issue their own demands. If they had a grievance, they could turn to an arbitrator. Peter Seitz, the impartial arbitrator who invalidated the reserve clause and created free agency in 1975, called Mr. Miller “the Moses who had led Baseball’s Children of Israel out of the land of bondage.”

A couple of years ago, I tried to launch a campaign to get Marvin elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame. Part of that was a desire to recognize someone who, perhaps more than anyone outside the lines of the field, reshaped the game that I've loved since I was a boy. He gave players not just real money but dignity and respect.

But, the other piece was just as important. Refusing to induct Marvin into the Hall of Fame was not simply a personal snub by the owners, who have decisive votes on electing non-players to the Hall of Fame, and who hated Miller for, well, doing what unions do well--equalizing the balance of power in the workplace.

Marvin said it best:

There’s been a concerted attempt to downplay the union,” Mr. Miller told The New York Times, referring to the Hall, when he narrowly missed out on election in December 2010, the fifth time he had been on the ballot. “It’s been about trying to rewrite history rather than record it. They decided a long time ago that they would downgrade any impact the union has had. And part of that plan was to keep me out of it.” [emphasis added]
It's just another way to wipe the history of unions from the canvass. Imagine if the union's role was highlighted every day to the millions of people who are fans of the game.

When I called Marvin a couple of years ago to tell him about the idea of a campaign, I think he was both touched (it wasn't the first time people had taken up the banner) but also realistic that he would never live to see the day. He was right: he understood how petty the owners are, and how, unfortunately, new players today think their fortune, and great riches, just fell from the sky because of the great skills they possess.

And that is why this matters. Because part of the crisis for unions--not the only reason, or perhaps not even a central one--stems from people forgetting how the American Dream was built (putting aside, for a moment, whether that Dream ever existed and whether it was built on a fantasy). Not by the "job creators". Not by the political leaders.

But, by people who struggle every day--the people who went on strike, the people who organized and, yes, the people who provided leadership.

That's why Marvin Miller's place in the Hall of Fame matters.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  he should be inducted (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    But allowing owners to have the say seems ridiculous. Perhaps the best way to get him in would be to change the rules. Seems pretty fitting, it's what he did. Sometimes, to change the game, you have to change the rules.

  •  T&R, but it's worse than that. (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    VClib, aliasalias, Karl Rover, Woody

    The first 2 times that Miller was voted down, the Veterans Committee was in charge. This was the version of the committee that included every living Hall of Famer and every living winner of the Frick and Spink awards (broadcasters and writers, respectively).

    Simply because players dominate the Hall of Fame, they dominated the membership of that version of the Veterans' Committee. So players refused to elect the man who got them the first raise in league minimum salary and meal money in 20 years and ultimately killed the hated reserve clause.

    I thought about Marvin Miller the other day as I listened to Mitch Williams pontificate about how greedy players nowadays are. What a hypocrite. He played entirely during the union era. And he didn't do it on the cheap.


    Just because you're not a drummer doesn't mean that you don't have to keep time. -- T. Monk

    by susanala on Tue Nov 27, 2012 at 12:50:37 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site