Skip to main content

Photobucket

The LA Times reports a better than expected jobs report showing the unemployment rate fell to a four year low, of 7.6 percent, due to the addition of 146,000 jobs, but also due, in part, to a large number of discouraged workers dropping out of the workforce.

The U.S. added more jobs in November, sending stock index futures up in pre-market trading immediately after the report was released. But underneath the headline numbers, the monthly report gave a mixed read on the economy.

The main numbers from the jobs report were encouraging. The Labor Department said the U.S. added 146,000 jobs last month. The unemployment rate fell to 7.7 percent from 7.9 percent, the lowest since December 2008.

This much is great news signaling that our economy is moving in the right direction, however, as we look at the details we see more of a mixed picture.

The unemployment rate fell largely because discouraged unemployed workers stopped looking for work, and weren't counted among the unemployed. Also, the Labor Department revised previously released jobs numbers downward, saying that employers added 49,000 fewer jobs in October and September than initially estimated.

Lund also wasn't so sure about the government's statement that Hurricane Sandy “did not substantively impact” the unemployment numbers. He expected Sandy's detrimental effects to show up in jobs reports over the next couple of months, as businesses figured out their post-storm plans.

Our unemployment numbers are still well above historical levels for this phase of the 4-7 year business cycle. For example, in the the recession of the early 2000s. the unemployment rate never exceeded 6.3 percent. At the high point of this recession, unemployment hit 10 percent and staid above 9 percent for almost two years.

To me, the data indicates we are suffering from multiple problems and we are seeing what is called the "super-positioning of multiple modes" of economic behavior. The data is not showing a typical business cycle recovery because the underlying economic forces causing us the most trouble are not those of the classic shorter-term "inventory work-force adjustment" that many believe are the driving causal dynamics of the business cycle.

What we are experiencing now, seems to me to be driven by a longer-term decades long trend in the loss of manufacturing jobs due to lower wages, less regulation, and targeted national industrial strategies in emerging nations in South-East Asia, and Latin America - and especially in China, where global multinational corporations can install the latest manufacturing technology and find an eager, relatively well educated workforce, willing to work for $2,000 to $,4,000 a year. And, favored industries in these nation's industrial plan often received huge subsidies, tax and regulatory forgiveness.

A few years ago, I read that highly well educated Indian Ph.D.s in computer programming earn the equivalent of $7,500/year. And, we well know the result of Japan's three decades long industrial strategy, starting in the 1950s, to capture the American automobile, and consumer electronics markets. China has announced the same kind of plan, including a declared intention to dominate the emerging solar, wind, and other renewable energy technologies, most of which were invented and developed originally in the U.S., giving their solar industries $30 billion in start-up subsidies. We can no longer ignore these competitive challenges.

Many of these jobs the U.S. has lost to "off-shoring" are not coming back, especially, where labor costs are a primary component. But, rather than become discouraged, our best strategy is to recognize that for many products the labor share of total product cost is now much smaller than it used to be. As of about a decade ago, I was surprised to learn that the labor share of the automobile cost was less than 7 percent.

And, Apple Computer is considering bring production of the Mac back to the U.S.

The U.S. has significant cost advantages in energy costs and political stability.

But, we also need to amplify the debate over the "fair trade - free trade" issues unions have been trying to bring to our attention for decades. The recent fire at the Walmart in Bangladesh, due to inadequate fire protection, allegedly involving deliberate prioritization of cost-control over worker safety, illustrates that unless we have a more level global playing field, economic policies of totally free trade, and free markets will drive global wages towards those countries with the lowest costs, industrial policy advantages, and lowest environmental and safety regulation.

Also, we need to develop a national industrial policy and strategy for improving our nation's competitiveness in the free market, as virtually all other advanced and emerging economies have done. Our stubborn refusal to do so, based on free market ideological purity,  comes from an arrogance, and unfounded assumption, that the US has such vast economic superiority over all the rest of the world that we do not need to be strategic about our competitiveness.  The data increasingly demonstrates this assumption is not true.

Improving America's economic vitality and international competitiveness should be an area of common interest with all sides of our divided political spectrum. Our political battles will become more bitter if we are fighting over ever smaller pieces of a shrinking pie. President Obama could exert much needed leadership by expanding our economic discussion to ways we can improve our national industrial health and competitiveness with wiser global strategies.

In this regard President Obama's modest $50 billion for an infrastructure bank should be the first of just many such investments in upgrading our electrical grid, accelerating our conversion to sustainable energy generation, and other enhancements to our industrial vitality that will pay rich dividends in a more prosperous future.

10:12 AM PT: More data that helps us visualize troubling long-tern economic issues beyond that of mere business cycle dynamics and should be upmost in the minds of shorter sighted politicians about to set off an austerity bomb at perhaps one of the worst possible moments.

Photobucket

10:16 AM PT: Photobucket

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (12+ / 0-)

    The means is the ends in the process of becoming. - Mahatma Gandhi

    by HoundDog on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 09:30:34 AM PST

  •  good post (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    HoundDog, elwior, ExStr8

    Join us on the Black Kos front porch to review news and views written from a black pov—everyone is welcome.

    by TomP on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 09:48:37 AM PST

  •  Jack Welch: "the Chicago-style coverup continues!" (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    HoundDog, elwior, ExStr8, TomP

    "Michael Moore, who was filming a movie about corporate welfare called 'Capitalism: A Love Story,' sought and received incentives."

    by Bush Bites on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 09:58:46 AM PST

  •  I'm waiting for GOP outrage to kick in (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    HoundDog, TomP

    because the numbers for September and October were revised downward, which naturally means the BLS was in the tank for Obama.

    If it hadn't been for those skewed BLS stats and white people not voting and Obama giving free stuff to minorities and women wanting free birth control and the 47 percent of the country who are deadbeats and Hurricane Sandy and those European election observers ... Dick Morris' landslide would have come true.

  •  new conservative talking point (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    HoundDog, ExStr8
    In June, a total of 142,415,000 people were employed in the U.S, according to the BLS, including 19,938,000 who were employed by federal, state and local governments. By November, according to data BLS released today, the total number of people employed had climbed to 143,262,000, an overall increase of 847,000 in the six months since June. In the same five-month period since June, the number of people employed by government increased by 621,000 to 20,559,000. These 621,000 new government jobs created in the last five months equal 73.3 percent of the 847,000 new jobs created overall.
    It's are all due to increased government employment.
  •  Civilian workforce grew at 135k/month (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ExStr8, TomP, 4mygirls

    No reason for such paltry numbers, except for GOP blocking every god damned jobs bill.....

    FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 10:38:12 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site