Skip to main content

      It is axiomatic that when the Police see crooks robbing the bank, the bandits are not to be handed the keys to the vault and the manager escorted off the property. Yet that is exactly what is happening in the case of In re: eToys 01-706 (DE Bankr. (2001)). Make NO mistake in your presumptions here, this Blogger ('Diarist') is also a Victim, a Witness and a WhistleBlower in one of the largest cases of Racketeering in our federal systems of justice.

Bad faith public servants perpetuating manifest injustice in Breach of their Fiduciary Duty

                               does NOT alter the reality/ severity of the Facts!


       Mitt Romney sought to be "retroactively" retired from August 2001 (back to February 1999) - in order to dodge probable culpability as CEO of Bain Capital when the eToys frauds transpired. He has been able (thus far) to get away with such skullduggery; because they made a Bain Capital law firm partner (Colm Connolly of www.MNAT.com ) to be the United States Attorney in Delaware and protect Goldman Sachs/ Bain Capital from being investigated (see Colm Connolly's DOJ resume and notice the time he was a Partner at MNAT is the very same time Romney seeks to be "retroactive" - http://www.justice.gov/... ). The IMPORTANT issue at hand is the fact that MNAT and Paul Traub have (ALREADY)  Confessed to 34 acts of Perjury / deliberate Fraud. However, the [DEALaware] federal justice [improperly] ruled that no proof of Perjury transpired (despite the confessions) - (see Judge Walrath's Opinion pages 50 - 52 http://petters-fraud.com/... ) . What Her Honor [sic] was really "dodging" is the fact that she would have had to refer the matter to Colm Connolly "officially" and he would have then been required to recuse himself because of his connections. By (illicitly) declining to apply the law that is unambiguous (those who lied to the court MUST be removed); this justice has become duplicitous in an arbitrary & capricious manner (FBI calls such Civil Rights violation "Color of Law").

       On December 4, 2012, the court had (originally) scheduled an evidence hearing for the Emergency Motion to address Fraud issues (they named it the "Haas Filing"). This was the 1st pleading where I could finally name Mitt Romney and the court not argue that it was "politically" motivated. I am told (by a Paul Traub former law firm partner); that they intend to punish me for not "playing ball" until Hell freezes over.

       



Full Disclosure and an Frugga U to the Naysay/ Trolls

     Laser Haas and his company (CLI) where the court approved "wind-down" senior executive entity of eToys approved by federal order to maximize returns with minimum expense.

    Thus - there's no debate that I belong in the battle - it is My JOB!



    The MNAT and Paul Traub law firms, along with Barry Gold, are ALL connected (secretly) - to Bain Capital/ Mitt Romney. This is the VERY reason Mitt Romney sought to be "retroactively" resigned the year 2001 (back to February 1999) - in order to "dodge" the fact that MNAT, Barry Gold and Paul Traub have (already) - CONFESSED - to 34 acts of Perjury/ Fraud against our company eToys.

    It is the JOB of the Bank Manager to call the police and get bank robbers arrested!




     YES - I want to get paid back what they STOLE - it IS my Civil Right!




    The  "naysays" and (ugly) Trolls among us (many from the legal professional) - (some are also "venerate's" here) - HATE Laser Haas and seek to assist the Organized Criminals succeed - by calling names, calling for my banning and other such stuff (that appears to be the GOP Bible 101 way to kill the message/ messenger). They are the real "pariah's" of this realm. Rooting and assisting the dark side under the veil of being "real" DK'rs.

       

 
 Frugga them & their white hourse prophecy Romney failed to achieve!



     As the rules of Diary's are - if you don't have a "fair" approach - LEAVE!

    Or - as Samuel Adams stated;

     “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”





   

Summary of the Organized Crimes

     
 Mitt Romney (pic right from DK maggiejean) and his Bain Capital etc vis-a-vis the MNAT law firm) - "merged" The Learning Company with Mattel in 1999 (thus MNAT works for them). Mattle lost $2 Billion and Romney / cohorts purchased The Learning Company for pennies on the dollar. The next thing in mid 2000 was Mitt Romney's Stage Stores filed bankruptcy (see Rolling Stone Matt Taibbi's article "Greed and Debt" The Truth About Mitt Romney and Bain Capital'). Romney owned the controlling shares and Michael Glazer was a "Director" at Stage Stores. Barry Gold was the "directors assistant" and Mr. Gold hired Paul Traub's firm to work for them.


     Then, in the fall of 2000, Bain Capital (now with people inside the Toy powerhouse Mattel) - acquired Kay Bee Toys (who had the CEO of Michael Glazer) (again see the latter part of Taibbi's - "Greed and Debt" story).



     Prior to this time (in 1999) - Goldman Sachs tooks eToys.com public (IPO) and the law firm in Delaware (where eToys public entity was formed as a corporation) - that works for Goldman Sachs is also MNAT. The stock soared to $85 but eToys received less than $20. Romney/ Bain Capital desired a "non-public" eToys and so did Goldman Sachs. So the books were "cooked" and a bogus bankruptcy was filed by MNAT. Then Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel (MNAT), the same law firm that also handled the Mormon Church's claim on the Howard Hughes Will (MNAT's client) - LIED (and confessed they lied) - in order to become eToys (Debtor) attorney. Paul Traub lied about his connections (conflicts of interest) to Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Mitt Romney, Bain Capital and Barry Gold - to become the eToys "Creditors" attorney.


        Upon the success of Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital (CEO Mitt Romney at that time), MNAT and Paul Traub's schemes to destroy the eToys public company; a wrench in the works entered the game. Specifically, yours truly (Laser Haas and his company CLI) - became the court appointed fiduciary to wind-down eToys and maximize the values while securing the assets. Once the plot & ploys to buy the entire $8 billion worth of eToys for only a few million - began to fail - MNAT/ Paul Traub then placed in their (secret) partner Barry Gold as President/ CEO of eToys and threw out Laser Haas/ CLI.



        Thus, eToys, with MNAT as Debtor's counsel, Paul Traub as Creditor's counsel and Barry Gold as President/ CEO - all having secret (UNdisclosed) connections to Goldman Sachs, Mitt Romney and Bain Capital; utilized their schemes & artifices to defraud to (in reality) be Bain Capital employees selling (OUT) their court approved clients to benefit their (secret) clients of Michael Glazer/ Kay Bee/ Bain Capital/ Mitt Romney (REMEMBER now - Mitt Romney believed he was on his way to the White House where he could hand pick his very own Attorney General of the United States).





Tell DOJ to Investigate Mitt Romney's Serial Fraud & Perjury



        Who the "REAL" culprits are here is MNAT, Goldman Sachs, Paul Traub, Barry Gold, Mitt Romney, Bain Capital and Michael Glazer.  As you can see by the incestuous (less than 2 degrees of separation) chart above right. They are an "enterprise" of "association in fact" persons (the very definition of RICO) - who continuously utilize a Bankruptcy Ring of perpetrators to steal billions and buy things like Clear Channel Communications. In the hopes to expand the power/ reach of their organized criminal empire to become POTUS. Then they put the excess monies (and profits of their crimes) - OFF SHORE. Or they reinvest them in other schemes & artifices to defraud.

        As a case in point, please see the Taibbi "Greed and Debt" story. Just as Barry Gold was a "directors assistant" who was then made President/ CEO with $50 million as his check book to pay himself, MNAT and Paul Traub millions of dollars for helping Goldman Sachs/ Bain Capital destroy and sell eToys for FREE. Michael Glazer was Kay Bee's CEO who wrote himself a check for $18 million and Bain Capital one for $83 million and then filed bankruptcy of Kay Bee Toys.


       Now, as you would surmise, this is (of course) ILLEGAL conduct of the highest order. However - it has NOT been properly investigated and/ or prosecuted - because of a CORRUPT federal prosecutor named Colm Connolly (pic right). MNAT, Barry Gold and Paul Traub have (already) CONFESSED that they lied under oath about MNAT (secretly) being the attorney for Goldman Sachs and Barry Gold/ Paul Traub (secretly) being partners. They offered me Bribery in 2001 and I reported it to the Dept of Justice in Delaware. This caused them to panic, Mitt Romney to resign and Colm Connolly (who was a partner of MNAT from 1999 to August 2001 - see his RESUME at DOJ archive http://www.justice.gov/...   ); where Colm Connolly was then made United States Attorney (federal prosecutor) in Delaware and he broke the law to bury the case.

     Therefore - I ask the readers these questions

                      Should I lay down to Mitt Romney's power & federal corruption?




My White House Petition seeking a federal investigation into this




http://www.politicususa.com/...





Conclusion and Prayer for Relief




         Yes, the court has ruled against me (AGAIN). The court said she is tired of me, tired of the case and doesn't want to hear it. The naysays and trolls among U.S. say the same thing. The court has ruled that the Clerk of Court is to forbid my attempts to enter the evidences in this case.

          To the Court Corrupt, the Clerks Corrupt and the Naysay/ Trolls

                  Plus MNAT, Traub, Gold, Romney, Bain, Goldman Sachs

                              and the CORRUPT Federal personnel

                                                  I say

    My name is Laser Haas.

         You are WAY more powerful than I am

                        But - unlike you - I believe in our Laws & Constitution.

                                              I AM JUSTICE COMING

                           

    FUCK ALL OF YOU ORGANIZED CRIMINALS
                                                aaaannnndddddd

                                  If the Judge ruled in accordance with Law
                                 we would not be in this banter/ battle now

                                      Any brown nosing naysay/ troll

                                                   Ban me or Not

                                                Justice IS coming!




Originally posted to laserttheliquidator on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 08:28 PM PST.

Also republished by The Bain Files.

Poll

Should one lay down to power & corruption?

9%5 votes
74%38 votes
0%0 votes
15%8 votes

| 51 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Unclear (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    laserhaas

    When is the evidentiary hearing on the so-called "Haas Filing?" Did it already take place on Dec 4th or was it rescheduled for a later date?

    Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.

    by winsock on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:02:19 PM PST

    •  Or (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      laserhaas

      Is this the hearing where you were ruled against?

      Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.

      by winsock on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:05:47 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  NO - the Haas Filing hearing was POST Poned (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Sandino

        at the request of MNAT, Barry Gold and Paul Traub's local counsel (Rosner).

        In other words - the very people who have confessed to lying to a judge 34 times - asked the judge for permission to destroy the victim/ witness/ whistleblower

        (which IS against the law to do - by the way)

        and the Judge said

        PERMISSION GRANTED!


        Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

        by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:47:36 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  So, they asked for a postponement ... (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          laserhaas, johnny wurster

          so they could gather evidence?  That's hardly an irregularity.  What evidence against you are they likely to produce that will "destroy" you?  If they have such evidence, they're certainly entitled to have it considered.

          "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

          by Neuroptimalian on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:56:01 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Not true "Neuroptimalian" - they asked for (0+ / 0-)

            the Judge to grant them the relief to Take Over my hearing date and make it theirs.

            Where they then LIED openly to the court and CONTINUED to hide the fact that they also work for Bain Capital.

            The judge said she has to believe them (despite the fact that they have CONFESSED to lying to her 34 times before)

            and that "they" (Bain Capital [secret] attorneys) are the ONLY ones who she grants permission to inform her of the fact that they (Bain Capital) is perpetrating fraud on the court.

            They have NO evidence to provide proof they don't have connections to Bain Capital/ Mitt Romney

            For here it is (public docket records)

            MNAT represents Bain in the Kay Bee Toys case
            http://petters-fraud.com/...
            and here's proof that Paul Traub was hired in Stage Stores (and also GOT CAUGHT there too - for NOT disclosing his connections)
            http://petters-fraud.com/...



            NOTE

            Stage Stores case of Paul Traub lying about his connections to Barry Gold (and by the way - Michael Glazer CEO of Kay Bee was also a Director at Stage Stores)
            was BEFORE the eToys case.

            MNAT worked for Romney/ Bain, so did Traub, Gold and Glazer.

            Then they all LIED to get inside eToys - PRETENDING to be good faith attorneys to help my company - and they SOLD OUT their court approved clients for the sake (benefit illegal) of their UNapproved clients Bain/ Kay Bee/ Glazer

            If they Judge allows that evidence to be put (properly) into the record (as is REQUIRED by Law) - then she has to (by LAW) refer the matter for Prosecution

            18 U.S.C. § 3057(a)

            What is really transpiring is - they are Faking as if they are going by the law - to PREVENT justice from transpiring.

            You don't catch men robbing the bank - hand them the keys to the vault  - and remove the manager!


            Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

            by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:08:36 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  So sue the attorneys for malpractice. (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              laserhaas

              "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

              by Neuroptimalian on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:12:27 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  You are being obtuse to the problem at hand (0+ / 0-)

                I've got CONFESSIONS

                My company was the court appointed fiduciary

                The LAW ( § 327(a) - In re Middleton Arms) is UNambiguous and MANDATES that Paul Traub, MNAT and Barry Gold are to be disqualified and refered for criminal prosecution.




                HOWEVER;

                They were NOT prosecuted (or even investigated)

                Because Mitt Romney made one of his very own attorneys to become the United States Attorney over the prosecution.

                I've given it to the new US Attorney and even the Public Corruption Task Force (in Los Angeles)

                and they SHUT IT DOWN - Threatening career Assistant U.S. Attorneys to keep their mouths shut Or ELSE!

                http://articles.latimes.com/...



                Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

                by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:18:25 PM PST

                [ Parent ]

    •  NO - winsock - she said I do NOT have her (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      winsock

      permission to have a Haas Filing hearing.

      The only people that are "permitted" to inform the court that crimes are transpiring - are the very parties who are perpetrating more crimes

      (Remember - they have ALREADY confessed to lying/ fraud)

      What has really happened is the police told the crooks not to rob the bank. They went ahead and did it anyway. Got CAUGHT in the Robbery.  Then the police took the bank manager out (moi) and handed the Robbers the key to the vault they are fleecing.

      The Judge ruled that it doesn't matter anymore (Romney lost the election - Thus - he can STEAL eToys and get away with it)

      MNAT can FORGE a Haas Affidavit stating I waived my rights to be paid. But HAAS has NO rights to inform the court that such a filing is a forgery.


      Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

      by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:08:18 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  There must be more to that story. (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        winsock, laserhaas, VetGrl

        If your signature to an (implausible) affidavit was forged, the notary involved can be subpoenaed to testify as to whose signature s/he witnessed.  Being denied the right to produce such evidence is grounds for appeal, one which should be won easily, regardless of how corrupt / tired a judge may be.  And judges generally tend to avoid giving obvious grounds for appeal.  Thus there surely must be more to the story of the situation.

        "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

        by Neuroptimalian on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:02:42 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  You are making assumptions of Facts NOT in (0+ / 0-)

          evidence.

          I never said there was a Notary.

          The Court ORDERED that MNAT (remember Morris Nichols was the court appointed attorney for me and eToys) - where MNAT was to supply my paperwork to the court for my court approved company (CLI) to get paid.

          They (originally) were going to sell eToys to Bain/ KB for $5.4 million.

          I made them pay tens of millions.

          That is why they (illegally) brought in Barry Gold (from Stage Stores) as President/ CEO

          He was also (secretly) a partner of Paul Traubs (and this IS CONFESSED)

          So the "diametrically" opposed Creditor v Debtor relationship mandated by Congress NEVER existed.

          AFTER MNAT confessed it lied under oath 15 times:


          Then, MNAT (while NEVER giving me service) handed the court a Haas Affidavit - stating I had "standing" to "waive" my rights to be compensated $3.7 million and that I "abandoned" the company eToys.




          Now - if for even a nano-second - you say that you believe I gave up my rights to be paid; we are done speaking.



          The Haas Affidavit says NOTHING about a waiver and actually states (in lines 10 & 11) that I can be paid my fees and expenses. (obviously the judge NEVER read the 2 page item).


          What is MOST absurd - is the fact that the court "claims" that I "HAVE" standing to "waive" my rights to be paid; but that I am FORBIDDEN to have standing to inform the court that the (purported) Haas Affidavit is a FORGERY.


          Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

          by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:25:51 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  First, it'd be helpful if you'd stop ... (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            laserhaas, VetGrl, highacidity

            repeating yourself.  Continually restating the allegations of fraud, etc., makes your comments too long when we've already been informed of those "facts".

            Secondly, affidavits are typically signed before a notary.  It sounds like what you're alleging is not, in fact, a "Haas Affidavit" (i.e., an affidavit purportedly signed by you), but an affidavit concerning you.  Totally different animal.  

            If the situation is indeed as corrupt as you allege, it sounds like you'll still have to take the issue up on appeal.  But if these attorneys are indeed folks you hired, I'd sue them for malpractice and file a complaint with the state bar seeking disciplinary action.

            I was involved in a massive battle against judicial corruption in California.  I know how big an uphill battle things like this are.  

            If you want people to support you, you should create a blog on the subject and provide links to ALL documents involved so readers can see for themselves what's going on.  A pro per litigant trying to explain complicated legal issues usually persuades no one.

            "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

            by Neuroptimalian on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:41:11 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Yes - I signed a piece of paper in front of a (0+ / 0-)

              notary. They spliced it together with another paper from 11 years ago and the notary is no longer at the firm and the firm claims it has NO record.


              Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

              by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:54:13 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  Okay, I see that it was notarized ... (0+ / 0-)

                by a California notary.  I used to be a notary in California.  To obtain that designation, I had to take a test and be fingerprinted (at the Santa Monica Police Dept., I believe).  I also had to post a bond.

                I always kept a copy of every document I notarized as part of my records.  I don't remember if that was a requirement.  I do remember that I was required to keep a log book into which I wrote the details of my services.

                You might want to contact the California notary licensing organization and tell them you want to file a claim against the bond of Mr. Duckworth.  They may provide enough information to allow you to track him down and go from there.

                "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

                by Neuroptimalian on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 11:43:51 AM PST

                [ Parent ]

                •  Getting $5k (the statutory max) form Mr. Duckworth (0+ / 0-)

                  for not keeping the document with him - is to little avail.

                  His copy would only show the 2 pages in question.

                  The part that they "display" in open court (always when I'm NOT physically present) - and state it is a "Waiver";

                  has never been placed in the docket record.

                  As for the part 2 page item they submitted as docket item 816 (which -  by the way - was Never noticed to me)

                  states in items 10 & 11 - that CLI "CAN" be paid fees.

                  Thus, it is Not a waiver.

                  The judge ruled on this - AFTER - they confessed to lying under oath (In re Brady/ In re Giglio) - thus their testimony is worth less than a grain of salt.

                  In addition - she is violating the Code (327(a)) - in permitting disqualified counsels to stay in place - at the direct (readily apparent) material adverse harm of their court approved clients.

                  The FIX is IN - because the Circuit Senior Justice also came from MNAT and (at least one other) was promoted to the Circuit - to quash the case.

                  There are more than 257 counts in this case and they are continuing (as they did on December 4, 2012) to mount the counts.

                  I am now forced (because the judge erroneously banned me from filing in her court) - to go to another (and higher) authority.

                  We cannot permit a few bad apples to be able to wreck an entire system of justice.


                  Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

                  by laserhaas on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 12:17:09 PM PST

                  [ Parent ]

            •  LOOK DOWN to comment - I KNOW (0+ / 0-)

              this is getting TOO slim here...


              Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

              by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:54:51 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

            •  You can see the affidavit for yourself (0+ / 0-)

              Here (PDF).  It's near the end.

          •  A different take on CLI getting paid (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Adam B, winsock

            From one of Troubled Company Reporters' regular reports on industry news:

            The Post Effective Date Committee asked the Bankruptcy Court to dismiss Collateral Logistics' claims because the Firm acted in bad faith by ignoring its own retention agreement, failing to file fee applications and failing to prosecute its proofs of claim.

            The Debtors hired Collateral Logistics in April 2001 to assist in the liquidation of the estate inventory and to establish security measures to ensure there was no diminution of assets during the liquidation process. Since its retention, the Firm has failed to file any fee applications or provide the Debtors with records and invoices to support the amounts it listed in its proofs of claims.

            The Committee's counsel, Frederick B. Rosner, Esq., at Jaspan Schlesinger Hoffman, LLP, told the Bankruptcy Court that the Debtors had expressed dissatisfaction over the services provided by Collateral Logistics.  Their complaints include lost equipment and the validity of the fees and expenses that Collateral Logistics sought to charge to the Debtors' estates.

            Here's a link (emphasis added).  It's a long page but the piece can easily be found by running a "find" on eToys.

            Haas's claim that its was MNAT's job to make sure Haas got paid is utter nonsense (and MNAT was most assuredly not CLI's or Haas's counsel).  

            MNAT was supposed to assist with the formal fee applications, which makes sense because they can be tricky.  To do so, however, MNAT needed the underlying documents, e.g., invoices and statements of services, which Haas failed to provide.

        •  See where reasoning gets you? (4+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          VetGrl, IndieGuy, MGross, highacidity

          The diarist is a CT junkie who will never answer a straight question.

    •  That is why I have a White House Petition (0+ / 0-)

      You KNOW that B O would NEVER stand for this (and wants to spank Wall Street - plus find a reason to tighten up the regulations).

      I've got a WONDERFUL surprise

      (she helped me gain POWERful friends)
      by going Off the deep end.


      Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

      by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:09:53 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I'm not so sure of this (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        laserhaas

        Obama refused to prosecute Bush administration officials who were complicit in some pretty questionable practices.  How much of this was due to political considerations, I don't know.  But anything that smells of going after Romney may not be something that Obama would wish to pursue.

        Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.

        by winsock on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:19:30 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  So, the premise B4 the election was Romney (0+ / 0-)

          could NOT be investigated - because it would (appear) to be politico motivated.

          Now that the election is over - Mitt Romney is Hands OFF - because it "smells" of going after Romney?????

          How can it be claimed as retaliatory (what they are REALLY doing to me) - when Romney lost and Obama won?

          Are you holding to the premise that all one has to do to get off with organized crime - is to simply run for office (and therefore be immune from prosecution)????

          That's a Very SCARY precedent!


          Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

          by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:27:31 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Well (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            laserhaas

            if you can't do it pro se and action by the President is the only alternative, it doesn't look promising.  Is there no one in Delaware, uncorrupted and with standing?  Must this be handled in bankruptcy court? What's your stake in this?

            Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.

            by winsock on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:50:00 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  2 things - 'winsock' - I've ALWAYS had attorneys (0+ / 0-)

              from the very beginning - until they CONFESSED.

              Then - all my attorneys told the court that I vanished
              (when my files and computer were actually in their office and I was there Every Day).

              It is AGAINST the Law - for an attorney to fail to inform the court that "other" lawyers are Breaking the Law

              18 U.S.C. § 4 MisPrison of a Felony

              http://www.law.cornell.edu/...

              Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.



              This is the real name for "knowledge before and after the fact of crimes transpiring".




              Do you NOT find it at least a little bit odd - that I turned down their bribe, reported them, they confessed (in part) and then my court approved attorneys abandoned me?


              Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

              by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:57:36 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  So file a complaint with the state bar. (1+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:
                laserhaas

                "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

                by Neuroptimalian on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:06:30 PM PST

                [ Parent ]

                •  Ha Ha. Do you KNOW who sits on the State Bar? (0+ / 0-)

                  And (especially) - who Chairs the Bankruptcy Bar?

                  none other than

                                                   M N A T

                                                          N'est-ce pas!


                  Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

                  by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:27:17 PM PST

                  [ Parent ]

                  •  So file a complaint with a federal grand jury. (1+ / 0-)
                    Recommended by:
                    laserhaas

                    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

                    by Neuroptimalian on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:43:00 PM PST

                    [ Parent ]

                    •  I'm talking to former fed agents and former (0+ / 0-)

                      State Supreme Court justice (retired in other states)

                      about my options.           I've many.

                      Because they have engaged in Fraud on the Court (as OFFICERS of the Court) - there's NO SOL (In re Hazel Atlas Glass U.S. Sup (1944)) (which was cited by both the judge in this case and the U.S. Trustee).

                      However;

                      Had Romney NOT run for POTUS - no one would care.

                      The fact is, his hubris (and even the judge's haughtier) to go forth in bad faith - has assisted my chances GREATLY

                      I've (recently) made new (powerful) friends and may even take on a serious partner (who will relieve me from my indigent status and provide counsel).

                      Meanwhile - I have more than 10 days to appeal (FRAP)
                      because the Federal Government is "named" as a party (I've 45 days).

                      Within 2 weeks, I am going to make a decision
                      and do something that is no longer a vain effort of going up against those damnation bent to bury (cover up) the case to save face.

                      Unless they get a new dose of common sense (because my only goal is to do my job)

                      We are ALL IN - and the results will be worth of same.


                      Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

                      by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:52:03 PM PST

                      [ Parent ]

                      •  Well, if you have the benefit ... (2+ / 0-)
                        Recommended by:
                        laserhaas, highacidity

                        of such high-level and high-powered advisers, there's nothing I can suggest to top what they can come up with.  Good luck in your battle.

                        "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

                        by Neuroptimalian on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:55:21 PM PST

                        [ Parent ]

                        •  I will "know" their true intent - in short order. (0+ / 0-)

                          You are in reception of PM's (2)

                          and know that I sought to assist your cause, when you were unjustly placed (and even spent time/ money to get the word out).

                          You are a True American of the best kind!

                          Thank you for taking the time to stop by.

                          (btw - if there's anyone you know needs help - that is what I do now - Too!)


                          Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

                          by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 11:19:06 PM PST

                          [ Parent ]

          •  Even if everything you say is true, ... (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            VClib

            it's not Obama's problem to deal with.  That's what the appeals process is for.  There's also the possible option of filing a complaint with a federal grand jury.

            "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

            by Neuroptimalian on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:05:31 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  I've gone to appeals. The Judge that went after (0+ / 0-)

              them (Delaware Dist Ct Kent A Jordan) and NY Supreme Court Moskowitz - were Both Promoted OFF the case.

              KAJ to the 3rd Cir

              Moskowitz to the NY Sup Ct of Appeals

              Then their rulings were totally ignored and the cases closed

              the NY Supreme Ct case (601805/2002) has been placed (ENTIRELY) Under SEAL to hide their crimes

              These guys are WAY too powerful to do anything with - (other than) - to keep trying and trying to find my Eliot Ness.

              The judge is forbidden by law to Block filings (as is the clerk) and the 3rd Circuit said the FRAP do NOT apply to this case.


              Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

              by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:12:38 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  There's that FRAP claim again (4+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:
                Rich in PA, Adam B, winsock, Catte Nappe

                Haas has made this claim before and it has to do with Robert Alber's appeal getting dismissed because he failed to timely file his opening brief, even after numerous extentions.  From what I can tell based on available documents, he sought to invoke a specific appellate rule to argue that the brief he finally submitted to the district court was timely filed.  

                It's a mertless claim.

                Bankruptcy court orders are subject to two layers of appeal.  The first is to either the district court or, in jurisdictions that have them, the bankruptcy appellate panel.  The losing party from this first appeal would then go to the circuit court.

                That first layer of appeal is very plainly governed by Part VIII of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.  The Advisory Committee Note to Rule 8001 unambiguously explains:

                These rules in Part VIII apply only to appeals to the district courts or bankruptcy appellate panels. Subsequent appeals to the courts of appeals, or direct appeals by agreement of the parties under 28 U.S.C. §1293(b), are governed by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
                See here for the text of Rule 8001 and Advisory Committee Notes; see here for Part VIII table of contents.  

                Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is likewise unambiguous:

                These rules apply to an appeal to a court of appeals under 28 U.S.C. §158(d) from a final judgment, order, or decree of a district court or bankruptcy appellate panel exercising appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §158(a) or (b).
                To summarize, when Alber appealed from the bankruptcy court, the Bankruptcy Rules applied.  When he appealed from the district court, the Appellate Rules applied.  There is no room for an argument to the contrary.
  •  Crayzee town (12+ / 0-)

    These diaries are beginning to verge on performance art.

    I love the part about Dkos 'venerates' 'rooting for the dark side secretly'. LOL.  Ahhh, Dailykos on the weekends. Never disapointing.

    Power-Worshipping Fascist

    by campionrules on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:08:15 PM PST

  •  I left your last Diary alone (8+ / 0-)

    because for once it did appear to be cogent, and that you really do have a case worth answering.

    I was pleased to see that it attracted much positive attention.

    This one I should Hide Rate for the blatant attacks against other Kossacks, but I simply can't be bothered.

    I wish you peace, Laserhaas, but I fear it may be a long time coming.

    I hope that the quality of debate will improve,
    but I fear we will remain Democrats.

    by twigg on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:15:46 PM PST

  •  What no one seems to take into consideration (0+ / 0-)

    is the fact that I AM a victim/ witness (and whistleblower)

    Also - I'm doing such (with hard evidence and CONFESSIONS) - against powerful persons who are our enemies.

    I'm not asking much

    Just an investigation by "honorable" persons.

    Is that REALLY too much to ask for????


    Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

    by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 09:45:34 PM PST

  •  I KNOW - that an attorney has a fool for a client (0+ / 0-)

    when he represents himself.  Because - he is too emotional.

    My education is minimal, my legal prowess - after the fact; and my writing abilities bite the whammy. (by the way - so does the stories of purported journalist's on this case).

    I sincerely believe I am in harms way and that the closer we get to the final battle - the more so I am (there are issues you and others here will never be made aware of).

    This is a very important battle to "return" the spirit of integrity of the judicial process to the realm. It is an arduous quest at best and I'm inept (at best). Be that as it may, G-d and his universe chose me from some reason.

    The truth being out there, if the unthinkable should transpire, even if it be by feeble me;

    is better than the truth (especially for Jack Wheeler's sake) - being buried with me.


    Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

    by laserhaas on Sun Dec 09, 2012 at 10:59:42 PM PST

  •  "wind-down senior executive" (7+ / 0-)

    I previously asked Haas to post the retention agreements between his company, Collateral Logistics, Inc. ("CLI") and the eToys estate.  See here and here.  Haas refused but I found them anyway (PDF).  Haas posted the agreements in this diary a little over a year ago.

    The agreements confirmed that Haas has been greatly exaggerating his authority in the eToys case.  He was approved to do some work, which the first agreement specifies as:

    Services.  CLI agrees to provide Collateral maintenance and liquidation services to eToys, including establishment and oversight of appropriate security measures and other controls at the Warehouses and corporate offices of eToys, confirmation and inventory counting, oversight of Collateral transfers and removals by purchasers thereof, and other related activities designed to maintain and liquidate the Collateral in an organized, secure, and professional manner (the "Services").  To provide the Services, CLI agrees to devote to this project one senior supervisor, two junior supervisors and three auxiliary personnel. CLI agrees to provide the Services for a period of sixty (60) days commencing on March 14, 2001 and ending on May 12, 2001 (the "Term").
    In other words, it's just what Judge Baxter described in the order dismissing Haas's claims: transportation and security services.  

    After the eToys auctions had concluded, CLI and the estate executed an amendment to the agreement pursuant to which CLI would provide the following additional services:

    (a) Management of Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment ("Additional Service A'').  CLI shall provide security for, and shall supervise, coordinate and manage:
    (i)  the Debtors' surrender and release of leased furniture, fixtures and equipment ("Leased FF&E") located at: (x) the Debtors' corporate offices; (y) the Warehouses; and (z) the Debtors' leased secured facilities located at Herndon, Virginia and Sunnydale, California (the "Secured Facilities"); and

    (ii) the transfer and relocation of any or all furniture, fixtures and equipment ("FF&E") owned or leased by Debtors to the extent it becomes necessary for the Debtors to relocate from any existing facility to another facility or downsize its occupancy of a facility presently being occupied by the Debtors;

    (b) Sale of FF&E ("Additional Service B").  CLI shall provide security for, and shall supervise, coordinate and manage the sale of:
    (i) all FF&E owned by Debtors ("Owned FF&E"); and

    (ii) any FF&E with respect to which the Debtors have rejected the underlying lease or financing arrangement but which has not been retrieved by the applicable leasing or financing entity within the timeframe established by the Bankruptcy Court and has been deemed abandoned pursuant to an applicable order of the Bankruptcy Court (the "Abandoned FF&E"); and

    (c) Management and Sale of Inventory ("Additional Service C").  CLI shall provide security for and shall supervise, coordinate and manage the sale and/or relocation of all inventory of the Debtors which was unsold as of May 15, 2001 (the "Remaining Inventory").  Sales of inventory may be conducted at any facility of the Debtors or at such other location as may be agreed upon by the Debtors, the Committee and CLI.  Further, sales may be accomplished by means of private sale, public sale or public auction as directed by the Debtors with the consent of the Committee.
    Again, transportation and security services and managing the sale of FF&E and inventory that hadn't been sold at auction.  This narrow range of authority comes nowhere near the claim that Haas was the head honcho at eToys.  More to the point of the Haas story, the agreements make clear that Haas was without authority regarding the auctions, the terms of the KB Toys bid, or the investigation into the financial affairs of eToys.  The terms of the retention agreement make clear that when Haas says this:
    Because eToys sold the bulk of the assets to Bain Capital/ Michael Glazer / Kay Bee for tens of millions of dollars (I KNOW - because I did the selling as approved by the court).
    It isn't true.  Neither is this:
    When we sold eToys for approximately $100 million to Bain Capital Kay Bee - MNAT, Paul Traub and Barry Gold reduced the prices to less than pennies on the dollar.
    Or this:
    Yours truly was the court approved fiduciary to secure eToys assets and sell them to the highest bidder. When I arrived, that was Bain Capital/ Kay Bee at $3 to $5.4 million dollars. I forced them to pay tens of millions - which pissed off the attorneys who were suppose to be working for me.
    Or this:
    When Bain Capital had announced they were buying the entire estate of eToys for $5.4 million; we halted the auctions and forced them to pay tens of millions of dollars more. Bain Capital’s cohorts of MNAT, Barry Gold and Paul Traub then reduced the prices to almost free.
    For the record, KB Toys paid $5.4 million for the inventory and $3.4 million for the eToys name and website.
  •  May I petition for a change of venue? (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    VetGrl, MGross, Catte Nappe

    I don't think this is the appropriate forum for private legal disputes, even if (especially!) when one of the parties is someone we dislike.  And I do mean Romney, by the way.

    You know, I sometimes think if I could see, I'd be kicking a lot of ass. -Stevie Wonder at the Glastonbury Festival, 2010

    by Rich in PA on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 04:22:05 AM PST

  •  To paraphrase Crocodile Dundee: (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    VetGrl
    This isn't a diary.  This is a diary!
    Sorry, laserhaas, but the facts don't seem to fit the hyperbole.  It's easy to see why so many are starting to call you out on the CT.  You really need to fix that.
  •  Oh wait, you're unbanned again? (0+ / 0-)

    Or is this another account you've made to get around your previous banning?

  •  In good faith I posted this D - knowing you (0+ / 0-)

    and yours could not resist the urge to assault upon me.

    Your "yet" reflection makes my case for me - of your intent. You and your ilk like to come out and kick a dog when he is down. It is a mob mentality of the most heinous kind and serves no good purpose.

                              you should be ashamed!



    Soon, the next legal move - will speak to your error.

    It is also sad, that others talk to me away from, that they are weary of this hateful spirit prevelant here. If you should be successful, with your evil desire of getting me "banned" - I would consider it a badge of honor against you/ yours

                   and a sad state of affairs for this realm.

    All I've ever asked for is a proper (honorable) good faith federal investigation against our known enemy and (apparently) - you believe that is too much to ask for.


    Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

    by laserhaas on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 11:45:03 AM PST

    •  Good faith??? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Adam B

      You post this

      The  "naysays" and (ugly) Trolls among us (many from the legal professional) - (some are also "venerate's" here) - HATE Laser Haas and seek to assist the Organized Criminals succeed - by calling names, calling for my banning and other such stuff (that appears to be the GOP Bible 101 way to kill the message/ messenger). They are the real "pariah's" of this realm. Rooting and assisting the dark side under the veil of being "real" DK'rs.
      in the middle of a brightly bordered text box and then say with a straight face that you're acting in good faith?
    •  Good faith (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      VetGrl

      Can you post a copy of the order (and opinion) barring your further filings?

      •  When you admit they lied under oath - THEN (0+ / 0-)

        you can ask for more.

        Until you stop holding to the premise that they did NO wrong and I'm out of my mind.

        Stick your "can" requests in the same realm as your [non-exist] good faith intent!


        Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

        by laserhaas on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 02:00:47 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Point us to the document (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          laserhaas, VetGrl

          Which contains these 34 admissions.  Or list them.

          •  You guys/ gals have your own PACER etc (0+ / 0-)

            as is noticed by the pleadings/ rulings retrievals.

            Every single time they submitted a Rule 2014/ 2016 Affidavit with each "initial", interim, monthly, special and final fee application that stated (erroneously) that there were NO conflicts of interest ("COI")

            Thus, they lied (I went threw them 1 by 1) over 34 times (and are STILL continuing to lie - Hiding Bain Capital).

            There's NO debate on the fact that they Confessed
            In both the US Trustee Motion to Disgorge and the OPINION of the court of October 4, 2005.

            AND

            If you admit they lied you are (in essence) taking notice (or Judicial Notice should be taken under FRCP 201) - that they parties "failed" to disclose a COI.

            In re Middleton Arms (6th Cir (1994)) - states that the Bankruptcy Code is "UNambiguous" in the issue that Failure to Disclose

            MUST result in disqualification

            (This is based on the premise that the "failure" to disclose was affirmatively false misrepresentations to the court).

            If the parties had been disqualified (as Required by Law)

            We would not be having this conversation.


            Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

            by laserhaas on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 02:38:57 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

          •  BTW - you are still dodging the question. (0+ / 0-)

            Did they fail to disclose?

            Did they lie?

            (this is my simple premise and you cannot find fault with it as both the US Trustee in the Disgorge Motion and the Court (in its OPINION) - has already concluded the deceptions were deliberate).


            Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

            by laserhaas on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 02:40:36 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

        •  That's a two-way street, sir (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Adam B

          The specifics of the services you agreed to provide are quoted in a comment of mine upthread and they are linked to documents bearing your signature that open in the "petters fraud" website with which you appear to be associated.

          Based on those documents, will you admit that you've been misrepresenting to this community your role in the eToys case?

      •  I have the order (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Adam B

        When it became evident that Haas would be unwilling to post requested documents, I signed up for PACER myself.

        I don't have a place to post the order, but here are its pertinent contents:

        WHEREAS, on March 7, 2011, eToys, Inc., PMJ Corporation, eKids, Inc., and eToys Distribution, LLC (collectively, the “Debtors”) commenced these cases by filing a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code; and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order Confirming the First Amended Consolidated Liquidating Plan of Reorganization, the bar date for filing administrative claims was set as May 3, 2003 (180 days after the effective date of the Plan) (the “Bar Date”) (D.I. 1385, 1406); and

        WHEREAS, since July 2004, Mr. Haas, appearing pro se and acting purportedly on behalf of Collateral Logistics Inc. (“CLI”), has filed dozens of pleadings in this bankruptcy case; and

        WHEREAS, it is a well-settled law that corporations may not appear pro se and non-lawyers may not represent a corporation in an action, see, e.g., Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993) (stating that “a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel”); and

        WHEREAS, CLI, a corporation, is a legal entity separate from its president and shareholder, Mr. Haas; and

        WHEREAS, by Order dated November 10, 2011, the Court held that Mr. Haas did not have standing to be heard on behalf of CLI or himself because he was not a creditor, shareholder or party in interest in this case (D.I. 2459); and

        WHEREAS, on October 24, 2012, Mr. Haas filed an emergency motion for payment asserting an individual claim for payment under the Court-approved contracts between the Debtor and CLI (the “Haas Motion”) (D.I. 2478); and

        WHEREAS, to the extent that the Haas Motion is a claim on behalf of Mr. Haas as an individual, that claim is barred because it was filed almost a decade after the Bar Date and Mr. Haas has been actively involved in this case and never asserted any individual claim; and

        WHEREAS, Mr. Haas’ numerous filings in this case are repetitive, without merit, and border on harassment; and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to the All Writs Act, the Court has the power to bar further pleadings by Mr. Haas in these circumstances, see 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a); United States v. Gomez-Rosario, 418 F.3d 90, 101 (1st Cir. 2005) (holding that courts have the ability to enjoin a pro se party from filing frivolous and vexatious pleadings); Shafii v. British Airways, PLC, 83 F.3d 566, 571 (2d Cir. 1996) (noting that an injunction is appropriate where a litigant engages in filing of repetitive and frivolous lawsuits); Cok v. Fam. Ct., 985 F.2d 32, 34 (1st Cir. 1993) (“Federal courts plainly possess discretionary powers to regulate the conduct of abusive litigants.”); In re Oliver, 682 F.2d 443, 445 (3d Cir. 1982) (holding that an injunction restricting filings was necessary where the pleadings constituted a continuous pattern of groundless and vexatious litigation); therefore, it is hereby

        ORDERED, that the Haas Motion is DENIED; and it is further

        ORDERED, that any further pleadings filed by Mr. Haas in this case shall be deemed stricken; and it is further

        ORDERED, that the Clerk’s Office is hereby directed to return, without docketing, any further pleadings which Mr. Haas may file in this case.

        D.I. 2490, entered Dec. 6, 2012.
        •  In other words ... (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          VClib, VetGrl

          ... it's not so much the content of Haas' pleadings (though they are "repetitive, without merit, and border on harassment," much like his diaries) as that he has no standing to pursue them personally, or on his company's behalf without counsel.

          •  I wouldn't say that (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Adam B

            My guess is that Judge Walrath wrote the order with an appeal in mind.  Haas already took the standing issue with respect to CLI to the Third Circuit as part of the disclosure litigation.  He lost.

            As for Haas's individual claim, bar dates are unforgiving and there's case law aplenty so holding.

            What Judge Walrath thinks about the content of Haas's pleadings is in the string cite.  Because Haas refused to provide documents I went ahead and got a PACER account.  After looking at the docket entries and reading some of the pleadings, I can say with confidence Judge Walrath was exceptionally kind in the language she chose.

          •  You are sooooo full of bull and deplorable (0+ / 0-)

            I had counsel for many years

            Until - AFTER - the bad faith parties confessed to lying under oath to the Chief justice for the same amount of years.

            My attorneys - Abandoned me  - (and one even emailed me a threat from the bad faith parties to "back off")
            and your acting as if what I'm doing is wrong
            plus what they did (as attorney's lying under oath) - is
            OKAY

            You are still ignoring the fact that they lied under oath.

            and totally (biased) Obtuse to the fact that the LAW mandates their disqualification.

            What a gang of B.S. artists you are...


            Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

            by laserhaas on Tue Dec 11, 2012 at 05:01:44 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Which they? Who cares? (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              VetGrl

              You are as reckless with pronouns as you are with everything else.

              Corporations can't appear in court without counsel. Period.

              •  Lawyers CAN'T LIE in Court - PeRIoD! -- NOR (0+ / 0-)

                can they ABANDON their clients - PERIOD!

                Except that you (apparently) condone both practices;
                above the fact that those specific acts

                forced me to appear PRO SE.





                Additionally


                18 U.S.C. § 4 MisPrision of a Felony

                MANDATES that I report the crimes to federal authorities

                Being that the Delaware United States Attorney's office is vested in burying the case (to hide it's own shame)

                Apparently - public servants betraying their oath of office - is also Okay

                As you ALWAYS dodge the fact they LIED and STOLE






                It what (legitimate) world - does one need a Judge's - PERMISSION - to inform her that crimes are transpiring?


                Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain until Aug 2001. Proof of Bain & Romney Fraud

                by laserhaas on Tue Dec 11, 2012 at 06:35:32 PM PST

                [ Parent ]

            •  Regarding the abandonment by attorneys (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              Adam B

              Here's what one of Haas's attorneys had to say to the court when it requested permission to withdraw as CLI's counsel:

              Significant differences have developed between Counsel and CLI such that Counsel is no longer able to work with CLI in a constructive manner with its client to prosecute this matter.  In order to preserve the attorney-client privilege, the description of these differences is necessarily truncated, but they may be described generally as (1) differences involving strategic and tactical decisions involving the CLI claims: (2) differences of opinion arising from Counsel's refusal to become involved in the various other matters in this case in which Haas, CLI's principal, has filed pleadings relating to alleged conflicts of interest, nondisclosures, criminal violations and conspiracies by and among various professionals and others in connection with this case; and (3) repeated attacks from Haas on B&H's [Counsel's] commitment to his cause, their ability and integrity.  Counsel respectfully submits that its clients have rendered this representation unreasonably difficult, such that it cannot maintain a cooperative relationship with Mr. Haas and thus, with CLI.
              Docket Item 2253, filed May 6, 2005.
              .

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site