Skip to main content

    I, like many of you, watch the actions of my elected and selected leaders, and am ready to scream almost every day. It amazes me that these people are sent to represent the constituents that voted for them, but instead, they tune out our voices and decide that they know what is best for us.
     I also read, watch and listen to the media coverage of these politicians. They also tune out our voices and support the decision makers choices. It seems that they see no other way. Read below to see an exchange I had with a reporter for the opinion page of my local paper.

    I live in Michigan, home of an out of control governor. I live in Detroit, a city unlawfully being taken over by outside entities. They are doing this for the people of the city, because we can't seem to do it for ourselves.
      Last year, the mayor and city council folded under pressure from the state to allow the city to be run by a financial advisory board under a consent decree. The city is broke, but now we are on the hook for fourteen million to pay for these people. They are forcing council to approve numerous millions in contracts to many outside reorganizing consultants. Their threat is to impose an Emergency Financial manager.
     In an effort to slow this runaway train, the mayor and the city council asked the city's top lawyer to explore the legality of the agreement. She returned to say that the agreement was not valid because per the charter, the city cannot enter into a contract with anyone owing the city money. The state owes the city around 275 million dollars in revenue sharing that it refuses to pay the city. Both the mayor and the council advised her to file a suit against the state. In turn, the city was threatened with bond downgrades and bankruptcy and every other alarming thing one can think of. The courts decided against her. This past week, the mayor and council fired her from her position.
     So today, I am reading an opinion piece in the paper about the city and the reporter called the attorney's actions misguided. I called her and asked her why.
     What followed was a fifteen minute conversation. She started by throwing many rapid fire scenarios that could have happened had we lost our bond rating and filed bankruptcy. I offered that we might have to file bankruptcy anyway. I then asked  that if our problem was revenue, what was being done in all these grand plans, to put the 30+% unemployed people to work?  She responded to me that until the city was restructured and had stable police, fire, and schools, we would not attract revenue producers.
     I pointed out that she completely overlooked the people I was referring to when I said revenue producers and that everyone desires stable services, especially the current residents. I also pointed out that these outside entities propose to solve the problems of revenue by breaking the backs of the the employees with pay cuts and furloughs and increases in healthcare costs.
     She said that this restructuring was needed for the city to survive, and that it was alright for the state to put pressure on the city with a carrot/stick approach to get them to do what was necessary to right the ship. She mentioned an Emergency Manager. Even though we put the law on the ballot and repealed it in November. The state just wrote another emergency manager law.
     I asked her if she thought democracy meant anything anymore and for her to show me one example of an EFM that was successful. I asked her to show me a restructuring firm that didn't leave the place worse than when they got it for the workers. I was about to ask her if trumping the results of an election with ramming through another version of the same law was acceptable but she stopped me.
She said that it was very interesting speaking to someone that held a differing opinion in a civil way and that she had to go. This was the end.
    I closed by asking her to look at things from the perspective of the people, and to use her voice to focus on the needs of them. She did not commit and the conversation ended.
    It is my hope that our conversation passed through her thoughts today, but I am afraid, at the end of the day, that her and her and those like her can see no other way.

     

Originally posted to lorla on Fri Jan 11, 2013 at 06:34 PM PST.

Also republished by In Support of Labor and Unions and Black Kos community.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  None of the work these people do is (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    lorla, shypuffadder, kurt, a2nite

    for us.  They only need us to get elected...the votes.  Not even that, in Detroit, really.  Once they are in, they only use us to stay there.  They do the work of the people that get them money.  Not the ten or fifty or whatever dollars that you and I send them.  They work for the people that get them the six and seven digit sums.  None of their actions will make things work for us; they are not designed to.  They are designed to reward the people that make them rich, or richer.  They will do only the barest minimum to make it look like they really would like to help us ( if only so and so wasn't blocking them), so that we will vote for them again in a few years time.
       I know its frustrating, maddening, infuriating, but it should not be surprising.  They don't work for us.  They work for themselves, and those that give them lots of money.  You are right in saying that they see no other way.

    When banjos are outlawed, only outlaws will have banjos.

    by Bisbonian on Fri Jan 11, 2013 at 08:13:11 PM PST

    •  How long (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Bisbonian, kurt

      before the frustration boils over? I am more than ready to organize but so many efforts just fall by the wayside.
      It has been my wish to see Detroit vibrant again before I die. I should have been more specific, because I don't want it to not include current residents.

      •  I certainly dont know... (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        lorla

        but not long.  Like the indigenous people in Bolivia that took back their water supply, it will happen.

        When banjos are outlawed, only outlaws will have banjos.

        by Bisbonian on Fri Jan 11, 2013 at 10:05:35 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site