Skip to main content

"If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich." ~ John F. Kennedy, in his Inaugural Address on January 20, 1961

* NOTE: This is personal and comprehensive (and scathing but honest and accurate) observation on the status of the current Republican Party --- written by an ex-Republican.

CAUTION! Contains adult material that may not be suitable for children.

Two different political philosophies on charity and taxes

More than ever, and mostly because of the Great Recession, many Americans now need government assistance, such as Medicaid and food stamps. Instead of responsibly padding the federal piggy bank in anticipation of a national emergency during the "good times", the Republicans recklessly raided the cookie jar, drastically cut taxes for the rich, ignorantly de-regulated the banks (albeit, with Bill Clinton's help), brutally outsourced millions of jobs under George W. Bush, who also gave us two controversial wars --- all that combined, is what had decimated our budgets and created our huge deficits --- putting a huge strain on our social programs today (aka "entitlements").

And after all their carnage was complete, after wrecking the economy and putting millions of once-middle-class Americans out of work, the GOP had the raw audacity to point their boney and crooked finger of blame at President Obama...but why? Was it because, like FDR, Obama had cared about the poor and middle-class? Or was it because Obama was too much like Theodore Roosevelt, the last Republican who cared about a "Square Deal" for the poor and average working Americans?

Or maybe it was really because Obama was half black.

The Democrats (for the most part) want to preserve our social safety nets. The Republicans, in very stark contrast, want just the opposite during these harsh times of severe economic hardship for millions of Americans. The GOP just wants to cut, cut, cut!

Ever since the unemployment rate was at 10.2%, when over 15 million people were out of work in October of 2009, most Republican state legislatures had thought that then was a good time to lay off thousands of government workers and to slash unemployment benefits. And some had even introduced drug tests in order for the jobless to qualify for those government "hand-outs", but the GOP lawmakers did not apply the same means testing for their own government salaries.

Across the board, the Republicans have been saying for over four years (beginning exactly on the same day that Obama was first sworn in as our President) that our country's number one priority should be the annual budget and the national debt --- so that our futuristic children (the great-grandchildren and the great-great-grandchildren) would not be saddled down with the burden of heavy debt, and so therefore, be forced to live among The Walking Dead.

When the Republicans forget who caused the debt, this phenomenon is known as
a "deficit attention disorder".

The Democrats feel much differently about real people than the Republicans do...the Democrats care about the children, the poor, the disabled and the elderly that we already have among us --- those who are currently living in the "here and now".

The Republicans claim we can't afford to feed our children and old people, and that it's not because we lack the necessary revenue streams, but because of wasteful government spending (as though, feeding people is also "wasteful" spending.)

Tax evasion (and fair taxation) is a major revenue problem

But we DO have a revenue problem --- and it's because of an under-funded tax collection agency that's battling tax fraud on a massive scale. (After all, how can we be expected to feed all those poor and lazy people if we can't bilk those poor and misunderstood billionaires?)

Last year the IRS identified roughly two million tax returns that were potentially fraudulent from the tax year 2011, a sharp increase that has the agency struggling to keep up. The agency's shrinking resources and growing responsibilities are making it next to impossible to prevent delays and backlogs.

On a budget of $11.8 billion in the 2012 fiscal year, the I.R.S. collected $2.52 trillion, meaning it brought in $214 for every dollar it spent. In other words, hiring more tax auditors to find tax cheats would be a great investment. But the Republicans argue, that with more tax cuts for the rich, they won't cheat as much!

While the IRS had pushed last year to increase its 2012 budget by $1 billion, the 2012 budget that was ultimately passed by Congress, had actually cut the IRS's budget by about 3%.

The national taxpayer advocate, an independent position with the I.R.S. that Congress created to assist taxpayers in resolving problems, has criticized Congress’s recent budget cuts to the I.R.S.

But in spite of those cuts, the IRS is boasting that so far, it has collected $5 billion from offshore tax cheats, even though in 2011 a study showed (- Download the PDF file - ) that 18-23% of total reportable income may not properly be reported to the IRS. This gives rise to a 2009 “tax gap” in the range of $390-$537 billion every year in lost tax revenues (That's a lot of food stamps!)

The IRS launched its first voluntary amnesty program in 2009 (when Mitt Romney had closed his Swiss bank account with UBS), and its second amnesty program in 2011. This year the agency introduced its third program. The IRS plans to examine the impact of their Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs -- which lures in tax evaders with the promise of reduced penalties --- but still, no jail time. Although....

Marie Estelle Curran, a 79-year-old widow in Palm Beach, Florida had inherited a Swiss bank account from her late husband worth $43 million. For nine years, instead of reporting her income to the IRS, she moved the money from one bank to another, even setting up a shell company in Panama. She is set to be sentenced next month (March 2013) and could face six years in prison. (Bankers get out of jail free, but grandma gets hard time? I doubt it.)

Who sounds more creditable? Who can we believe?

When the Speaker of the House John Boehner and the House Majority leader Eric Cantor tell us, "We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem" --- do you really believe them, or do you ONLY watch Fox News 24 hours a day?

In his closing argument during the O.J. Simpson trial, Johnnie Cochran had plead to the jury, "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit". How many people were convinced that O.J. was innocent?

When Michael Steele, the Republican Party's first African American to head the RNC, was immediately selected in the aftermath of President Obama's election, how many people were convinced that it was for merit alone, and not mostly to counter the first black president? (Some referred to him as a "token", and there were rumors that Oreo cookies were involved.)

How many people believe that a congressional member of the Tea Party, who hails from a Southern state, which has a long and well-documented history of voter suppression laws, isn't in any way bigoted, biased, prejudiced, or racist --- and would never suppress anyone's vote?

Well then, if you believe any of that, then MSNBC's Al Sharpton has a bridge to sell you.

Part of the GOP plan to divide and conquer

How many people believed, that when Newt Gingrich had called Obama the "food stamp president", it wasn't to divide whites and blacks --- and wasn't sneakily implying that the whites were the nice, hard working middle-class people, who were being unfairly forced to support the lazy and poor unemployed blacks?

If Eddie Murphy had tried to convince you that he was really white, and secretly a member of the Ku Klux Klan, would you believe him? If not, then how can you possibly believe the Republicans about not having a "revenue problem", especially when you know for a fact, that we have a huge problem with income tax evasion?

And why would anyone believe Newt Gingrich, or any Republican for that matter, who comes from a Southern state, and believes that it's mostly black people who are sucking up the government's revenues and living on food stamps and welfare, but yet, never mentions corporate welfare?

If the Republicans had ever wanted to discriminate against someone, and suppress their votes (because poor people don't vote, or shouldn't vote), maybe it should be the white people, not the black people that they should shun --- because most likely, there were almost as many poor white people voting for Obama as there were poor blacks and Hispanics combined.

Poverty is now officially bipartisan..."We are the forty-seven Percent!"

Bigotry and racism

All throughout 2009 and 2010, when we heard all the Republicans in congress and the Tea Party members rail against ObamaCare®, it was ridiculous to think that it wasn't at least partially driven by bigotry and racism. We weren't blind, we saw their protest signs. "Black people getting more free stuff" was the underlying (if not, subliminal) message we heard.

And who are these Tea Party people anyway? Just Dixiecrats, who were reincarnated.

And the same thing had occurred when we heard from all the GOP's presidential candidates
last year. It was so obvious --- it was thick enough to cut with a knife. Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum were the two most obvious offenders. (Herman Cain was the exception, but as a multi-millionaire, he didn't care too much about poor people either...and had only wanted to lower his own taxes with his 999 Plan).

We have all known a bigot in our lifetimes, or may have once been one ourselves. And many of us have bigots in our own families. Remember the TV show All in the Family? We all know a bigot when we see one; but to hear a Republican bigot deny this, it reminds us of Shakespeare: "Thou doth protest too much."

It was almost laughable; they all looked like lying fools...or as the fabulous Reverend Al Sharpton had once said in a TV ad, "They got the blueberry pie all over their face, they were the ones eating the pie!”

And still today, after over 30-plus attempts, the Tea Party-led Republicans are still wasting their time and passing legislation in the House to repeal ObamaCare® --- even though they knew these bills (like their abortion bills) would never pass in the current Senate. These old men remind me of bigoted old dogs with crusty old bones.

And what's even more atrocious is, the Republicans have vainly attempted to turn the argument around, by falsely saying that Obama hates all white people (such as his own mother and grandparents). The pot calling the kettle black (with every pun intended).

More Whites are Poor

In 2011, as a percent of the entire U.S. population, there were more blacks (35%) living in poverty than whites (13%); but by the number, there were far more whites (25,865,700) living in poverty than blacks. (12,876,400).Source:

According to the U.S. Census, they reported that in 2010, the poverty rate for:

  • Whites was 13.0% (30,849,009), and in 2011 went down to 12.8% (30,849,000) --- a change of -0.2% (most likely due to government assistance)

  • Blacks was 27.4% (10,929,000), and in 2011 it went up to 27.6% (10,929,000)  --- a change of +0.2%

But this doesn't tell the whole story either, because government assistance (e.g. TANF and SNAP) keeps people from ever being counted in the poverty rate. But even so, the rate for whites is lower compared to the total population, but the number is much greater, even though black people in the United States have a much higher risk of living in poverty than white people.

And when we look at people living in extreme poverty --- households making less than 50 percent of the "poverty threshold" (Excel files for download) --- of 20 million people who live at this alarming level, about 42 percent are white and 26 percent are black.

More Whites are also on Food Stamps

As of February 8, 2013, the latest data shows that 47.7 million Americans now rely on food stamps -- and 36% are white, while only 22% are black. Poverty has not just been a problem for minorities in urban neighborhoods (or those living in the rural areas of Southern states), but it is also beginning to devour what was a majority white middle-class in the suburbs as well.

The New Poor

A study from Stanford University shows that back in 1970, 65 percent of America’s families lived in “middle-income” situations. By 2008, only 43 percent of U.S. families lived in middle-income neighborhoods. Meanwhile, over that same period of time, the share of families living in either poor or rich neighborhoods essentially doubled.

This is the new demographics (besides just the Latinos) that the Republicans missed in the last election --- the people whose policies they've helped exasperate (by making them poorer), so naturally they're going to vote against them.

According to the Social Security Administration, 50% of all workers in the U.S. workforce nets $26,966 a year or less (that's people of all races, colors, creeds, etc.)

Obama received 63 percent of the votes of Americans making less than $30,000 and 57 percent of those making between $30,000 and $50,000. Above $50,000, Romney won 53 percent of the votes of Americans making between $50 and a $100 thousand and 54 percent of the votes of Americans making above $100,000.

When the Republicans tried to divide the nation (and the vote), they used race (e.g. "food stamp president"). But then they accused Obama of dividing the country by using class [warfare]. But when white people lose their jobs (or are severely under-paid) and need food stamps to feed themselves and their families, they're not going to vote for an old rich white guy who promises to cut food stamps, they'll vote for a black man who at least acts as though he cares. (The Republicans call food "free stuff".)

PHOTO BELOW: During the Great Depression, and especially in the Dust Bowl, most poor people were white --- but just like today, the Republicans didn't want to give them "free stuff" either. And back then, just like today, the Republicans had also accused the unemployed of being lazy drunks.

“Three or four million heads of households don’t turn into tramps and cheats overnight, nor do they lose the habits and standards of a lifetime. They don’t drink any more than the rest of us, they don’t lie any more, and they’re no lazier than the rest of us. An eighth or a tenth of the earning population does not change its character which has been generations in the moulding, or, if such a change actually occurs, we can scarcely charge it up to personal sin.” – Harry Hopkins, Federal relief administrator under Franklin D. Roosevelt – 1933

* Note: I Photoshopped "coffee and donuts" in the picture to read "stuff" :)

Pompous, cheap, stingy and hypocritical millionaires

Vice-presidential loser Paul Ryan (who last year wanted the capital gains tax rate for the rich to be 0%) is currently touting more budget cuts that would eliminate food stamps for 1.8 million adults and children --- and would also eliminate Meals on Wheels for our seniors.

And what was the GOP thinking by running Mitt Romney for president last year, the poster boy of wealth and excess? "I'm not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there." The net he promised the voters he would cut.

People like Mitt Romney (and many billionaires on the Forbes Fortune 400 list) have always acted as though they're entitled to hoard millions and millions of dollars every year. And Mitt Romney, who doesn't care whose pension he steals, represents everything that's gone wrong for the poor and  middle-class in this country over the past 40 years --- and it's only getting worse.

That's why black people get "free stuff", for the same reason that white people like myself do; because unless you were rich to begin with, the Republican Party has been screwing us all.

There's far more poor people than there are rich people, and there will only be a growing number of poor white people in the future. Instead of a "lost decade", we will most likely have a "lost generation".

But in all fairness to the current Republican leaders, they don't hate all black people, unless of course, they're poor. But they do hate all poor people, that's why God made so many of them, just to piss off the Republican politicians.

And that's also why, at this rate, only the richest (and/or the dumbest) people will ever be voting for any future Republican candidates, no matter what color they are. But if they do, may God help us all.

* Full Disclosure: I know these things, because I too was once a Republican, and ignorantly believed everything the GOP leaders and Fox News had told me --- But no more! --- And that's why I hate Republicans and the Fox News channel. Thank God I've finally seen the light!

Related Post:
 Republicans Think I'm A Lazy Black Man

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  small observation that may be statistically (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    flawed, looking at percentage of people on public assistance from blue states to red states, it seems more Republicans than Democrats are on public assistance; does anyone have the actual numbers either as real numbers or percentages?

    •  Red States... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      ...take in more in federal dollars than they pay out in least, from everything I've heard and read. That's why the South should just make good on their threat, and cede from the union (FULL DISCLOSURE: My family is from the South.)

  •  One quibble: (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Gooserock, NancyWH

    God doesn't make poor people. Greedy rich people in high places do.

    Other than that, bravo, sir.

    Visit Lacking All Conviction, your patch of grey on those too-sunny days.

    by eataTREE on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 04:29:10 PM PST

  •  Wow, this is one heckuva diary. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    NancyWH, tmservo433, MRA NY

    Lots of information.

    I'm curious if you'd be willing to give more details on the reason you switched parties. I mean, what made you see the light so to speak?  

    I honestly think our country is better off with a strong moderate reasonable Republican Party.  I'd like to see Teddy take on the banks like did against corporations in his time.

    I'm glad you hinted toward the Gramm Leach Bliley act. That, in my opinion, is the impetus behind the Great Recession. I know there are other factors. However, that's the biggie.

    That gathering of stats on the poor is amazing.

    Thank you for putting this all together. You obviously spent quite a bit of time on this and it paid off.

    "If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin." Charles Darwin

    by Rockydog on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 04:40:16 PM PST

    •  Rocky - if you look at the author's comment (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Rockydog, NancyWH, tmservo433

      history you will see that he rarely comments, even in his own diaries. He has been here three weeks and looks like he is pimping his own blog.

      "let's talk about that"

      by VClib on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 04:56:11 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Why? (5+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      NancyWH, Rockydog, billmosby, MRA NY, freerad

      Because after 35 years of working full-time (before being laid off in 2008) I always paid my bills. Then suddenly, I'm in my 50's and can't find work and the GOP was calling me a lazy bum, and trying to cut everything I now need just for my basic survival. I changed parties around late 2010 after doing a lot a research with all my free time. I once used to watch Glenn Beck, and now I feel so ashamed  :(

      Thanks for the kudos!!!

    •  Commodities and futures modernization Act of 2000 (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      codified the credit default swap/

      FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

      by Roger Fox on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 07:48:35 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Roger, do you think credit default swaps (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Roger Fox

        Are the main reason behind the Great Recession or is it too big to fail?  Or ?  Just wondering. Thanks

        "If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin." Charles Darwin

        by Rockydog on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 08:07:31 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  credit default (0+ / 0-)

          Swaps are clearly the cause of mortagage crisis. A single point of failure. See wiki 2008 mortgage crisis.

          FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

          by Roger Fox on Wed Feb 20, 2013 at 06:56:59 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  I was on my phone (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          and this is a very important question.

          Historical perspective-
          Removal of the Glass Stegal bank firewall plays a key role, conflict of interest is now possible.

          Commodities and futures modernization Act lays the legal foundation for Credit default swaps.

          In one regard too big to fail is a separate issue from what caused the mortgage crisis/Recession. What caused banks to fail were the ratio of exposure to crappy loans/solid assets.

          Credit default swaps were a vehicle that allowed the contagion to spread world wide. A US bank wrote crappy mortgages, then bundled them together as a financial instrument (credit Default Swap) and sold them to another financial institution, lets say in the EU.

          Lets say there was one big bank with 40 billion in exposure to crappy mortgages, that failed. And we're going to play "re-write History".

          SO we break up that bank into 10 smaller banks. The aggregate exposure to credit default swaps is the same for the 10 small banks as it was for one big one. Maybe 1 or 2 small banks played it safer and limited their exposure. So 8 out of 10 banks fail. Theres still a panic, still a bail out. The contagion still spreads.

          Big banks should be broken up into consumer and commercial institutions, as per the Glass Steagal bank firewall, that was repealed under Clinton. And the credit default swap should probably be legally limited if not eliminated.

          With the proper safeguards big banks should be stable, and with a healthy blend of smaller banks and credit unions, balance in the market can be had.

          FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

          by Roger Fox on Wed Feb 20, 2013 at 07:36:14 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  Minor Quibble, the Debt and Race Are Not the (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Roger Fox, NancyWH, billmosby, brae70

    reasons for Republican policies, they're only the excuses and motivators for voters.

    The Republican philosophy is that government must not impose taxes to pay for promoting the general welfare. It must not promote the general welfare at all.

    The only reason they want to cut, for example, Social Security is that they still don't have the votes to terminate it. But that's their goal, it's been the corporatist and libertarian rightwing's goal since 1935.

    No welfare, no food stamps, no public education, no Social Security, no Medicare, no workers' comp, no postal service, no ACA. None.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 04:42:45 PM PST

  •  U3? U6 peaked out @ 17.2% 30 million people (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 04:51:42 PM PST

  •  One scary thing that seems to keep happening- (0+ / 0-)

    That ol' Overton Window has moved so far to the right, and hasn't stopped moving yet, that all the talking heads I see on most of the "news" channels actually seem to be ok with current tax rates and don't even seem to question anything about the "necessity" for major cuts in government budgets.

    It's almost like none of them have any memory of the time 15 or 20 years ago when we were much more prosperous with higher tax rates by far than we have now.

    As a side note, I personally know of a case where somebody got an extra few tens of thousands of dollars he/she was not expecting this month, and the first thing out of his/her mouth was "oh, no, I have to pay more taxes now". Really? That's the first thing you thought? lol.

    Moderation in most things.

    by billmosby on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 07:18:28 PM PST

  •  the reason we only hear (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    about poverty rates and percentages on public assistance is because the raw numbers tell a tale they dont want people to know...that there are more whites living in poverty and on public assistance than there are black people... not just more than black people living in poverty and on public assistance; more than all black people in the US of every economic strata...

    Fear doesn't just breed incomprehension. It also breeds a spiteful, resentful hate of anyone and everyone who is in any way different from you.

    by awesumtenor on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 10:20:42 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site